Text

bikiniarmorbattledamage:

bandagedapollojustice:

people keep gushing over female character designs that “show that you can still kick ass and be feminine and cute!!!” yea ok we all get it now show me a female character whos design doesn’t prioritize making her attractive

I don’t really have much to add. It’s all about the designer’s priorities.
Bolding mine.

~Ozzie

America Chavez in Young Avengers? Lucifer in Wicked + the Divine? Off the top of my head, they seem pretty kickass women who aren’t designed for sexiness first.

Photoset

buzzfeed:

Superhero bands are a thing that should happen.

Video

weloveshortvideos:

Random crow shows up on dude’s porch, looks him straight in the face and says ‘fuck you’

(via shippinu)

Text

michaelclulee said: How about this; Take the horror house concept, the one you go to visit in some warehouse kind but this time it's Blair Witch themed. You and a group of others are only allowed to camp out at night on your own at a location in the forest chosen by the organiser. You are given your own Blair Witch themed mystery to solved and you only have a torch with no spare batteries (so use it sparingly), basic camping supplies, a map and three days to solve it. The organisers have the right to scare you.

patrickklepek:

How about fuck no.

That actually sounds fucking cool. Way cooler than the film, for sure!

Photoset

pleatedjeans:

22 Pictures That Prove Kids Are Freaking Weird

I can see my kids doing any of these. Any.

Photoset
Photo
Oh man, that’s a tattooable quote right there.

Oh man, that’s a tattooable quote right there.

(Source: oatmeal)

Photoset
Video

"Oh man, Kanye’s just a humour vacuum man, he just takes the fun outta everything…"

(Source: davidcho, via buzzfeed)

Photo
thebicker:

stfueverything:

zbuqeefrankieztein:

appropriately-inappropriate:

themaddfeminist:

thehowlingwolf:

torea-dumbass:

true-fae:

gaywerewolflady:

holy shit



tbh i thought this was a really neat idea for a dystopia or something until i realized what was allegorical by seeing the picture and getting a connection there. i was just so blind that this could be as stupid as it was i took it literally or as a classism stance for a minute. this is so dehumanizing i didn’t realize they were comparing women to food, what the fuck

Not only are they comparing women to food, they’re basically saying women’s bodies are a luxury ITEM.

And that men are entitled to any woman’s body they desire.

It’s bad when even 4chan thinks you’re gross.

they think they are being “denied” something.

Not to mention food is a fucking necessity to live. Having access to women’s bodies is not

In case anyone’s forgotten, this was Isla Vista shooter Elliot Rodgers’ entire reasoning for his shooting spree: that he was being unfairly denied access to women’s bodies.
In addition to the excellent commentary above (women: autonomous people, not consumables! touching boobs: not vital to staying alive!), in the original fucker’s “thought experiment” (pro tip: any time anyone uses the phrase “let’s try a thought experiment” they’re about to be an asshole), people are waving their food around. Except the food is boobs. People have very little control over whether they get boobs and how much they get. If you have them, it is difficult to hide or remove them. Having breasts is not a “luxury item” that you’re “waving around” in people’s faces. They’re a body part, and they’re there. This is the same mentality that shames young girls with sexist dress codes, the same mentality that blames rape victims for what they were wearing, and the same mentality that excuses street harassment. It is rape culture.

thebicker:

stfueverything:

zbuqeefrankieztein:

appropriately-inappropriate:

themaddfeminist:

thehowlingwolf:

torea-dumbass:

true-fae:

gaywerewolflady:

holy shit

image

tbh i thought this was a really neat idea for a dystopia or something until i realized what was allegorical by seeing the picture and getting a connection there. i was just so blind that this could be as stupid as it was i took it literally or as a classism stance for a minute. this is so dehumanizing i didn’t realize they were comparing women to food, what the fuck

Not only are they comparing women to food, they’re basically saying women’s bodies are a luxury ITEM.

And that men are entitled to any woman’s body they desire.

It’s bad when even 4chan thinks you’re gross.

they think they are being “denied” something.

Not to mention food is a fucking necessity to live. Having access to women’s bodies is not

In case anyone’s forgotten, this was Isla Vista shooter Elliot Rodgers’ entire reasoning for his shooting spree: that he was being unfairly denied access to women’s bodies.

In addition to the excellent commentary above (women: autonomous people, not consumables! touching boobs: not vital to staying alive!), in the original fucker’s “thought experiment” (pro tip: any time anyone uses the phrase “let’s try a thought experiment” they’re about to be an asshole), people are waving their food around. Except the food is boobs. People have very little control over whether they get boobs and how much they get. If you have them, it is difficult to hide or remove them. Having breasts is not a “luxury item” that you’re “waving around” in people’s faces. They’re a body part, and they’re there. This is the same mentality that shames young girls with sexist dress codes, the same mentality that blames rape victims for what they were wearing, and the same mentality that excuses street harassment. It is rape culture.